25 YEARS FOR A LIFE
51
LIVE AND EXECUTE, THOSE WHO DON'T...LET LIVE
Where is the incentive not to murder?
Consider this: even if you commit premeditated 1st degree murder, your chance of being sentenced to more than, 25 years on prison highly unlikely.
According to accounts in the Bible, just two people are responsible for all the people on the earth. Even after the great flood, the eight people birth the (6) billion that now inhabit the planet.
Pharaoh, enslaved the Hebrews because they multiplied so fast their numbers had over taken the Egyptians, and threaten their political stability.
The point is if you murder one person; you not only take their life, but the lives of all the children, they could have had as well as all their children’s, children’s, children to infinitum.
The idea of rehabilitating wanton murders is not justice. Not to be confused with accidental murders and loss of life by misadventure, at the hands of another.
Those who think that the Death penalty is harsh and in humane are misguided and compromising a penal system; strained for space to put all the, demons that walk among us; who take a life; do time, and come out to take more lives.
How many young innocent school girls have to be found raped, murdered and dismembered before we as a society understand that some of these people need to be put out of our misery?
Individuals who pursue murder as a hobby are not fit to [live] among us and the death penalty is the better way to deal with them for everyone concerned.
The Bible also encourages the death penalty is cases of murder, and our propensity as people to disregard that fact is just warehousing killers who may one day be loose to pray up on us all.
25 years for a life is not enough, the minimum should be at least 75, with out the possibility of parole.
Execution would be better, but in the absence of what is true justice at least lets have something that, reflects the indignation and outrage we feel as law abiding, citizens.
CommentsLoading...
Allowing murders to run free and sentencing them to only 25 years after several murders, is whats barbaric.
Stop for stopping by.
Should confessed murders be given the benefit of the doubt?
Can confessing being back the person or persons they murdered. The responsibility is on not committing murder.
Life in prison should be the standard. except in cases of accidental death.
For the most part I agree but what about crimes of passion? When let's say, a man becomes temporarily insane because he caught his wife in bed with another man. He forgets his senses and goes nuts and despite his normally gentle demeanor, his emotions take control and he kills either his wife or his wifes misteress.
Is that something that you would consider accidental?
These are mitigating circumstances and to be considered at sentencing.
Ralph Deeds Level 6 Commenter 24 months ago
Aside from the fact that there are too many mistaken convictions, nearly all civilized countries have recognized that capital punishment is a barbaric relic.